October 23, 2014 LSAT Minutes

  1. Follow-­up
    1. Community  Representative – Beth  Colleye  updated  the  group  on  the  three  candidates  she  is  pursuing  for  the  community  rep  (one  declined).
    2. Basecamp  – Everyone  new  to  be  invited  so  that  it  can  be  used  for  discussions.
  2. Parent  Info  Night  on  PARCC – The  group  discussed  what  would  be  most  useful  for  parents  as  well  as  the  best timing.    Given  the  HSA presentation  to  parents  on  assessments  generally  (not  just  the  PARCC)  which  is  scheduled for  December  9,  it  was  agreed  to  look  for  a  date  closer  to  the  PARCC  testing  but  still  sufficiently  in  advance to  help  families  prepare and  support  faculty.    It  was  agreed  to  look  for  a  January  date  which  would  also  benefit  from  work  that  the  faculty  will  be  doing  in  advance  of  the  test  administration.    In  advance  of  the  PARCC  meeting,  it  was  agreed  to  focus  a  large part  of  the  January  LSAT  meeting  on  reviewing  school  level  data.    Mr.  C  commented that  the  data  shows  in  many  cases  that  the  Murch  learner  community  does  not  evince typical  patterns  of  struggle  and  failure.Terri  Fuller  shared  with  the  group  the  most  current information  she  had  from  DCPS  regarding  testing  windows:  PARCC,  12  March  to  10  April  and  31  April  to  29  May  and NAEP  for  the  4th graders,  January  to  March.   This  was  followed  by  a  broader  conversation  about  the  volume  of  testing  at  Murch  and  whether  students  were  being  over-­‐assessed.    Many  expressed  the  desire  to  identify  which assessments  were  essential  from  an  instructional standpoint.  There  was  general  support  for  the  idea  of developing  priorities  and  a  calendar  that  maximizes instructional  time  – and  to  develop  strategies to  advocate for  just  the  most  effective  assessments.    Others  raised questions  about  how  best  to  balance  the  need  to  help students  be  familiar  with  the  technology  used  for  tests  without  taking  away  from  instructional  time.    The  faculty noted  that  some  aspects  of the  interim  assessments  were still  being  worked  out  and  emphasized  that  it  was summative  in  approach  and  not  formative.
  3. Community  Engagement  Program  -­‐-­‐ Sabrina  Finburg  updated  the  group  on further  ideas  for  a  program designed  to  engage  students  in  social  and  learning activities outside  of  school with other Murch community  members,  the  idea  being to create  out  of school enrichment  experiences  and  social  opportunities  for  students  who  don’t  regularly benefit.    It  would  depend  on  adult  volunteers  and  there  is  the  opportunity  to  partner with  other  schools.    Further  planning  will  be  rolled  into  a  building  diversity  group  that both  Sabina  Finburg  and  Terri  Fuller  participate  in.    There  is  the  possibility  of  using some of  the  OSSE  student  satisfaction  grant  funding  for  transportation.
  4. Enrollment – The  enrollment  audit  was  taking  place  that day  at  school  and  inspectors  (and  Mr.  C)  remained  at  the school  working  well  past  the  LSAT  meeting.    Preliminary  results  may  be  ready  by  the  December  meeting.
  5. Building  Renovation  Update  and  LSAT  input– Mr.  C  reported  that  there  was  no  additional  update  regarding  the  renovation  and  that  DGS  has  put  out  the  RFP  for  the  building  architect  to  be  selected.
  6. Printers  and  Copiers – Bethany  Little  asked  about  the  burden  on  faculty  and administrators  resulting  from  a  lack of  working  copiers  and  whether  parents  could  help  relieve the  problem.    Mr.  C  reported  that  three  new  (not refurbished  but  new)  copiers were  ordered  and  expected during  the  school  year.    Vicki  Otten  described  the  small stand‐alone  printer/copier  machines  used  in  the  5th grade and  the  group  discussed  whether  more  might  be  helpful  at other  grade  levels  while  the  large  copiers  were  on  order.  Parents  also  asked  whether  there  were  any  other  supplies or  tools  needed.
  7. Planning  Time – Bethany  Little  inquired  of  the  faculty and  administrators  about  the  effectiveness  of  the  pooled  planning  time  now  built  into  the  calendar.    She  asked  about  the  possibility  of  having  a  half  day  once  a  month  for  faculty  to  plan  when  an  outside group such  as  an  arts  organization  could  be  working  with  the  students  on  special  programming.
  8. Topics  for  Future  Meetings -­‐The  committee  plans  to  use  a  survey  tool  to  gather  a  complete  list  of  topics  and  Bethany  Little  has  agreed  to  design  a  survey  to  facilitate  prioritization.   The  results  will  be  discussed  at  the  next meeting.